November 04, 2008

Rethinking the Leadership of the G7

After today's vote, I think I'm going to have to rephrase how I describe the leaders of the G7 nations. Obama fans (and Obama himself) typically claim that America must restore its "standing in the world." This seems like an urgent need to people like Obama and his supporters because of opinion poll result like these from the Pew Global Attitudes Survey:


More recent findings seem to suggest a slight improvement in America's image, but it is still quite negative overall. Thus, it is imperative that we "restore" our image by electing the man who will do what the world wants him to do (e.g., be less inclined to militarily topple genocidal dictators, sign the Kyoto Protocol despite its negative consequences for the US economy and its virtual irrelevance in the battle against global C02 emissions, etc.).

In response to this sense of urgency, I usually ask some simple questions. First, what tangible result will accrue to America if, in opinion polls, people around the world now say that they like us better? I'd like them to respond that way for their own sake (just as we in America feel better when we like the president of France), but I've never been able to identify any tangible gain for America itself.

Second, what matters far more than mere opinion polls are the kinds of poll you take on election day (such as today in America). Do these negative feeling about America translate into the election of anti-American leaders? To find out, I follow who people elect in the nations of the G7 (namely, the U.S., U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Canada,and Japan). These are the democracies with the largest economies in the world. Together, they make up something like 65% of the world GDP (according to this report, at least). The elected leaders of these nations probably have a lot to say about whether or not their countries will cooperate with diplomatic initiatives and bolster economic ties. What is the story with respect to the leaders of the G7 now that George Bush has gone and ruined everything? Do the people of the G7 act on their anti-American feelings, or do they tend to vote for pro-American leaders despite those feelings?

In Italy, we recently had this news:

Conservative leader Silvio Berlusconi has scored a decisive victory in Italy's parliamentary elections, setting the billionaire and staunch US ally on course for his third stint as premier.

The victory is a remarkable return to power for 71-year-old Mr Berlusconi, avenging his loss two years ago at the hand of the centre-left.
...
Mr Berlusconi once said that he agreed with the US regardless of Washington's position. He calls US president George Bush a friend and his return to power is likely to make relations with Washington warmer, no matter who becomes the next American president.

What about Germany and Canada? Their most recent elections were summarized like this:

A Defeat for Anti-Americanism

Saturday, January 28, 2006; Page A20

ACCORDING TO his opponent, Canadian Conservative Party Leader Stephen Harper exposed "an agenda really drawn from the extreme right in the United States." He favored the Iraq war, opposed the Kyoto treaty on global warming, and is a social conservative to boot. He might just become -- heaven forbid -- "the most pro-American leader in the Western world." His victory would -- O, Canada! -- "put a smile on George W. Bush's face." Despite all those scary warnings, Mr. Harper and his party won Canada's election on Monday. That put an end to 12 years of increasingly incoherent and corrupt rule by the Liberal Party -- as well as the cynical and irresponsible attempt of its leader, outgoing Prime Minister Paul Martin, to use anti-Americanism.

Mr. Martin becomes the second G-8 leader in four months to exit from office after discovering that anti-U.S. demagoguery is no longer enough to win an election. Gerhard Schroeder, the former German chancellor, also tried to rescue his political career last fall by parading his differences with Mr. Bush; the result was the victory of Angela Merkel, who has moved swiftly to repair relations with Washington. Interestingly, both Mr. Schroeder and Mr. Martin won previous campaigns by playing anti-American cards, in 2002 and 2004 respectively. While it's not clear that the level of ill feeling toward the United States or its president has changed much in Germany or Canada, it's obviously not the foremost concern of voters fed up with domestic mismanagement -- or, perhaps, political venality.

Italy, Canada and Germany all elected pro-U.S. leaders? Who'd have thought that possible in light of America's "image" in the world? Let's consider the most recent election in France, which has been especially anti-American in recent years:

France Elects U.S.-Friendly Conservative

PARIS, May 7, 2007

(CBS/AP) Nicolas Sarkozy, a blunt and uncompromising pro-American conservative, was elected president of France Sunday with a mandate to chart a new course for an economically sluggish nation struggling to incorporate immigrants and the younger generations.

Who leads Japan these days? Until recently, this guy did:

TOKYO - Ruling party elder and political moderate Yasuo Fukuda is expected to win today's contest for the presidency of the Liberal Democratic Party, a victory virtually certain to make him the next prime minister of Japan in a parliamentary vote Tuesday.
...
Fukuda, 71, who would become the first son of a prime minister to take the job, brushed off questions yesterday about his Cabinet lineup on his way to a debate with his opponent, former foreign minister Taro Aso.
...
Fukuda is hardly the most charismatic or dynamic politician in Japan. The son of a former prime minister, he prefers gray suits, classical music, and moderate pro-American policies.

Well, he just resigned and we'll see who leads the nation after the next real election there, but I don't see strong signs of an anti-American trend caused by George Bush's policies.

Finally, the United Kingdom. Their most recent elected leader was the staunchly pro-American Tony Blair, and they have not yet held a national election to name his successor. Their current leader is Gordon Brown. He may not be as pro-American as his predecessor, but he is probably a lot more pro-American than some Americans are:

Katie Couric: "Finally Mr Prime Minister, ideally, what would you like the American people to know about you?"

Gordon Brown: "That I'm very pro-American and I've always been so. I feel America and Europe, and America and Britain in particular, because ours is a very special relationship, I feel that America and Britain can achieve so much in the next few years."

In summary, if you count George Bush as being pro-American (which seems fair), then all 7 leaders of the G7 now fall into that category. If they were all anti-American instead (like Jacques Chirac was), then popularity polls showing that America's image in the world is sinking would be more meaningful. In fact, it is precisely because of results like these that I do not attach much weight to America's "popularity" in the world, and I feel no urgent need to "restore" that image so that I can once again " walk with my head held high."

And here is where I'm going to have to change the way I describe the various losing politicians in the G7 elections. In Germany, for example, I categorized loser Gerhard Schroeder as anti-American and winner Angela Merkel as pro-American. In France, I categorized the extremely unpopular Jacques Chirac as anti-American and recent winner Nicholas Sarkozy as pro-American.

Well, starting today, I think I need to be a bit more diplomatic in how I characterize these people because we are about to elect our own Jacques Chirac. That is, ironically, the United States will be the first of the G7 nations to elect someone I might have undiplomatically characterized as being anti-American were he running for president in another country. So, from now on, I'll use different terms to categorize these people, like "proudly-pro-American" and "less-proudly-pro-American," or something like that. The proudly pro-Americans like America the way it is, whereas the less proudly pro-Americans think that America is not, but could be (with the right leader), the greatest nation on earth. Today, the United States seems on track to elect the first "less-proudly-pro-American" leader in the G7.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

John,

That was not Canada's last election. We had one on October 14th, this year, and Stephen Harper won again. He still has a minority government, but he has a bit stronger mandate than before.

Vilmos

Nate said...

Other countries have always been America-friendly. It's just that the friendship was more distant once Bush started running things. But now, the friendship can actually be something real, and can be built for cooperative tasks.

This will be my last post here for awhile, since it's become clear Back Talk is a clearinghouse for the Republican rump. (see recent Paul Krugman article for definition) It is my hope that tonight will see the establishment of a more just, wise leader and government.

One last note: if Engram wants to actually influence the American people rather than belittle them, he ought to focus on chaning the tone of his missives. The whole "I can't believe morons think the war is/has gone badly, and don't understand the reality I am about to lay out" is a deadender, and only serves to boost the author's own ego.

Best.

MarkD said...

Nate,

Professor Engram has reasons for his opinions, which he shares. I have to take issue with your unsupported opinions. Other countries have never really been America friendly. Like everybody else, they act in their own self-interest.

Why pay any attention to my opinion? Well, I lived in Japan for five years before the first Bush was even VP, my wife is from there, and I have friends and in-laws over there. You will find that most people outside the government don't really care about America or Americans except as it affects them. Why should they?

Your quest for universal friendship is doomed to disappointment. The partnership between the US and Japan has ebbed and flowed, and is definitely not "more distant since Bush started running things."

Things didn't work out too well for us during the Carter administration. I fear we are about to re-learn some expensive lessons.

Paritosh said...

I think there is a certain truth in the post. Coming from India, which officially claims to be non-aligned state since its independence, you will see the significant change in opinion based on what you are talking about.

We consider ourselves friendly to Americans mainly due to the economic ties, and more recently, the civilian nuke deal. We consider ourselves friendly to America, when Americans of Indian origin like the late Kalpana Chawla or the Democrat Bobby Jindal take the limelight... Or if we are praised as being the biggest democracy...

We consider Americans to be hostile, when it supports Pakistanis... Or when the WTO talks break down. Or when American concerns dictate our foreign policy. Or if we feel that the visa policy has turned a bit more restrictive...

So, it is every country for itself. Sometimes I try to imagine, what the world would be like if US wuld just look after it's own affairs...for a while focus on it's own internal issues. No troops in Saudi Arabia, no billions of dollars of foreign aid, no missile defence shield, no mission to spread democrcy..let the imperfect world be imperfect. After all, it does find the stomach to digest Chinese human rights violations in Tibet...why not ignore Iran?

What would it be like, when US stopped wanting to be a 'big benevolent brother' and just took care of it's own people?

Anonymous said...

You know ,I have some shaiya gold,and my friend also has some
shaiya money,do you kouw they have the same meaning,Both of them

can be called shaiya gold,I just want to
buy shaiya online gold,because there are many
cheap shaiya gold

Anonymous said...

 “胡一刀,曲池喝花酒,天樞!苗人鳳酒店喝酒 ,地倉,合谷!個嘶啞的嗓子低沉地叫暑假打工 著。叫聲中充滿著怨毒寒假打工 和憤怒,語聲從酒店小姐 牙齒縫中迸出來,似是酒店兼職 千年万年、永恒的咒禮服店 ,每一個字音上涂著血和仇恨。 突突突突四酒店經紀 聲響,四道金光酒店兼差,四枝金鏢連珠發出,射向兩塊木牌。木牌的酒店 正面反面都繪著一個全身人酒店經紀人 形,一塊上繪的是個濃髯粗豪的大漢,旁注“胡一刀”三字;另一塊上繪的是個瘦長漢子,旁注“苗人鳳”三字,人形上書明人体周身穴酒店現領。木牌下面接有一柄,兩個身手矯捷的壯漢各持一牌,在練武廳中滿廳游走東北角一張椅子中坐著酒店經紀爆米花個五十來歲的白發婆婆,口中喊著胡一刀或苗人鳳穴道的名稱。一個二十來歲的英俊少年勁裝結束,鏢囊中酒店經紀帶著十几枝金鏢,听得那婆婆喊出穴道名稱,右手打工揚,就是一道金光射出,釘向木牌。兩個持牌壯漢頭戴鋼絲罩子兼差上身穿了厚棉襖再罩牛皮背心,唯恐少年失了准頭,金鏢招呼到他們身上。兩人竄高伏低,酒店打工擺木牌,要讓他酒店上班不易打中。 大廳外的窗口,伏著一個少女假日打工一個青年漢子。兩人在窗紙上挖破了兩個小孔,各用台北酒店經紀右眼湊著向里偷窺。兩人見那少年身手不凡,發鏢甚准,不由酒店pt 互相對望了一眼,臉上酒店pt都露出訝异的神色。
  天空黑沉酒店應酬 沉的堆滿了烏云。大雨傾盆而下,夾著一陣陣的電閃雷轟,勢道嚇人粉味。黃豆大的雨點打在地下,直濺到窗外兩酒店經紀PRETTY GIRL少年男女酒店經濟 的身上。 們都身披油布雨衣,對廳上的事很感好奇酒店經濟再湊眼到窗洞上去看時,只听得那婆婆打工兼差道:“准頭還可將就,就是沒勁儿,今日就練到這里。”說著慢慢禮服店站起身來。

adis said...

Oes Tsetnoc | Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa | Kenali dan Kunjungi Objek Wisata di Pandeglang | Oes tsetnoc | Online Marketing | Electronics Gadgets | etips solution | Travel Guide